Murphy v. Columbus Mills

156 S.E.2d 657, 116 Ga. App. 198, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 741
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1967·No. 42720·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

Where, as in the instant case, a purported, although for many reasons a fatally defective, answer to a summons of garnishment has been filed by the garnishee within the time required by law, and such answer, as shown on the face of the record, remains untraversed and undisposed of, it should be first dismissed or otherwise disposed of before a judgment by default can be properly taken. Accordingly, the court did not err, at the same term upon discovering that such an answer had been filed in time, in setting aside the verdict and judgment by default, in order that the garnishment case might be legally disposed of. Dannenberg Co. v. Adler-May Co., 137 Ga. 111 (72 SE 906); Brown Realty Co. v. Joel Hunter & Co., 44 Ga. App. 146 (160 SE 681); Anderson v. Fulton County Home Builders, 147 Ga. 104 (92 SE 934); Aycock v. Royal Ins. Co., Ltd., 46 Ga. App. 299 (167 SE 551).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Columbus Mills, 156 S.E.2d 657, 116 Ga. App. 198, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

156 S.E.2d 657 (Murphy v. Columbus Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulton National Bank v. Young
179 S.E.2d 529 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)