Brown Realty Co. v. Joel Hunter Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brown Realty Co. v. Joel Hunter Co.

160 S.E. 681, 44 Ga. App. 146, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 615

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 3, 1931

Docket21023

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 160 S.E. 681 (Brown Realty Co. v. Joel Hunter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown Realty Co. v. Joel Hunter Co., 160 S.E. 681, 44 Ga. App. 146, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 615 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The trial judge, during the term at which the judgment was rendered, has a broad discretion in setting aside a judgment against a garnishee who has failed to answer after service of- summons of garnishment upon him. Russell v. Freedman’s Savings Bank, 50 Ga. 575; Atlanta Journal v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 111 Ga. 718 (36 S. E. 929) ; Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dickerson, 15 Ga. App. 293 (82 S. E. 942).

2. Where a garnishee, at the term of court at which a judgment was rendered against him, moved to set it aside upon the ground that he had not been served, and at the same time traversed the entry of service made by the officer, and where upon the hearing the garnishee testified that he had not been served with summons of garnishment, but the officer testified that the garnishee had been served, and where the garnishee testified that the first information which he had as to the rendition of the judgment was from his attorney, and that he (the garnishee) had previously several times received summons of garnishment in suits against the same defendant, and was in the habit of turning them over to his attorney for attention, that he had never owed the defendant anything, but that the defendant owed him $700, and, although the judge, upon the hearing of the motion and the traverse, overruled the traverse, thus [147]*147finding, .if not adjudicating, that the garnishee had been served, the judge nevertheless was authorized in concluding that the garnishee, in not answering, acted in good faith, without knowledge of the service and through a mistake of his legal duty. The judge, in setting aside the judgment at the term at which it was rendered, did not abuse the discretion vested in him by law to set the judgment aside.

Decided October 3, 1931. Nana W. Wolfe, Elijah A. Brown Jr., for plaintiff. Ralph R. Quillian, Dillon, Calhoun & Dillon, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. The trial judge, during the term at which the judgment was rendered, has a broad discretion in setting aside a judgment against a garnishee who has failed to answer after service of- summons of garnishment upon him. Russell v. Freedman’s Savings Bank, 50 Ga. 575; Atlanta Journal v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 111 Ga. 718 (36 S. E. 929) ; Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dickerson, 15 Ga. App. 293 (82 S. E. 942).

2. Where a garnishee, at the term of court at which a judgment was rendered against him, moved to set it aside upon the ground that he had not been served, and at the same time traversed the entry of service made by the officer, and where upon the hearing the garnishee testified that he had not been served with summons of garnishment, but the officer testified that the garnishee had been served, and where the garnishee testified that the first information which he had as to the rendition of the judgment was from his attorney, and that he (the garnishee) had previously several times received summons of garnishment in suits against the same defendant, and was in the habit of turning them over to his attorney for attention, that he had never owed the defendant anything, but that the defendant owed him $700, and, although the judge, upon the hearing of the motion and the traverse, overruled the traverse, thus [147]*147finding, .if not adjudicating, that the garnishee had been served, the judge nevertheless was authorized in concluding that the garnishee, in not answering, acted in good faith, without knowledge of the service and through a mistake of his legal duty. The judge, in setting aside the judgment at the term at which it was rendered, did not abuse the discretion vested in him by law to set the judgment aside.

Decided October 3, 1931. Nana W. Wolfe, Elijah A. Brown Jr., for plaintiff. Ralph R. Quillian, Dillon, Calhoun & Dillon, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.E. 681, 44 Ga. App. 146, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-realty-co-v-joel-hunter-co-gactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack