Murphy v. Boucaud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Boucaud

78 A.D.3d 1417, 910 N.Y.S.2d 693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 78 A.D.3d 1417 (Murphy v. Boucaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Boucaud, 78 A.D.3d 1417, 910 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II prison disciplinary determination which found him guilty of possession of stolen property and possession of property in an unauthorized area. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the tier II determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been credited to his inmate account. As such, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Green v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1645 [2010]; Matter of Wright v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1590, 1590-1591 [2010]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II prison disciplinary determination which found him guilty of possession of stolen property and possession of property in an unauthorized area. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the tier II determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been credited to his inmate account. As such, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Green v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1645 [2010]; Matter of Wright v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1590, 1590-1591 [2010]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.3d 1417, 910 N.Y.S.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-boucaud-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack