Doyle v. Fischer
This text of 87 A.D.3d 1189 (Doyle v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination rendered after a tier III disciplinary hearing. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Murphy v Boucaud, 78 AD3d 1417 [2010]; Matter of Auincola v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1672 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 711 [2010]).
Peters, J.P, Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.3d 1189, 929 N.Y.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2011.