Mur-Maid Enterprises, Inc. v. Townsend
This text of 951 F.2d 297 (Mur-Maid Enterprises, Inc. v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MUR-MAID ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant,
Elmer Murray and Joy G. Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
John Timothy TOWNSEND and Star Paper Tube, Inc.,
Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 90-8096.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1991.
Clifton M. Patty, Jr., Ringgold, Ga., Joseph E. Willard, Jr., Rossville, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
L. Hugh Kemp, Dalton, Ga., for defendants-counterclaim plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Harold L. Murphy, Judge.
Before KRAVITCH and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.
BY THE COURT:
Appellants' and appellees' stipulation of settlement is GRANTED. The panel opinion, published at 939 F.2d 939 (11th Cir.1991), certifying a question to the Georgia Supreme Court is VACATED and WITHDRAWN. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the Georgia Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
951 F.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mur-maid-enterprises-inc-v-townsend-ca11-1991.