Munson v. State
This text of 742 So. 2d 397 (Munson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael D. Munson appeals the summary denial of his motion to allow credit for jail time, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) We affirm because Munspn’s motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Munson’s ability, if any, to file another rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which specifies what court records, on their face, entitle him to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 So. 2d 397, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11609, 1999 WL 651960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munson-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.