Muniz v. Hoffman
419 U.S. 992, 95 S. Ct. 302, 42 L. Ed. 2d 264, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 4053, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2657
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 11, 1974
DocketNo. 73-1924
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 419 U.S. 992 (Muniz v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Muniz v. Hoffman, 419 U.S. 992, 95 S. Ct. 302, 42 L. Ed. 2d 264, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 4053, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2657 (1974).
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 3 and 4 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“3. Whether petitioners, charged with criminal contempt for an alleged violation of an injunction issued under the National Labor Relations Act, are entitled to a trial by jury under 18 U. S. C. § 3692, which provides that alleged contemnors are entitled to a jury trial in all contempt cases ‘arising under the laws of the United States governing the issuance of injunctions or restraining orders in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute.’
[993]*993“4. Whether Article III, Section 2 and the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution mandate a jury trial where a penalty of $25,000.00 is assessed against a labor organization in a criminal contempt proceeding.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Union Nacional De Traba-Jadores
527 F.2d 602 (First Circuit, 1975)
Ash v. Baker
392 F. Supp. 368 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
United States v. Chestnut
394 F. Supp. 581 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
394 F. Supp. 58 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Nominal
512 F.2d 909 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Rhodes v. Weinberger
388 F. Supp. 437 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Doak v. City of Claxton, Georgia
390 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Georgia, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
419 U.S. 992, 95 S. Ct. 302, 42 L. Ed. 2d 264, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 4053, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muniz-v-hoffman-scotus-1974.