Munford v. Pressmad Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Munford v. Pressmad Corp.

277 A.D.2d 135, 716 N.Y.S.2d 303, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered October 25, 1999, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants-respondents’ liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact preclude summary judgment, including whether plaintiff’s fall was caused not by defendants’ failure to provide him with a safe scaffold or ladder but by a seizure or fainting episode that plaintiff experienced just before he fell, and whether the injury that plaintiff alleges was sustained in a prior accident. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered October 25, 1999, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants-respondents’ liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact preclude summary judgment, including whether plaintiff’s fall was caused not by defendants’ failure to provide him with a safe scaffold or ladder but by a seizure or fainting episode that plaintiff experienced just before he fell, and whether the injury that plaintiff alleges was sustained in a prior accident. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Munford v. Pressmad Corp., 277 A.D.2d 135, 716 N.Y.S.2d 303, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 135 (Munford v. Pressmad Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related