Hucke v. Suffolk County Water Authority

119 A.D.3d 735, 989 N.Y.S.2d 333
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 2014·No. 2013-05647·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J), dated October 31, 2012, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). Their submissions demonstrated the existence of triable issues of fact, including whether the injured plaintiffs fall was caused by the defendant’s failure to provide guardrails on the scaffold he was using or, rather, by the sudden loss of consciousness that he experienced just before he fell (see Munford v Pressmad Corp., 277 AD2d 135, 135 [2000]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Mastro, J.P, Chambers, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hucke v. Suffolk County Water Authority, 119 A.D.3d 735, 989 N.Y.S.2d 333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

119 A.D.3d 735 (Hucke v. Suffolk County Water Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grieve v. MCRT Northeast Constr., LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 04700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Medina-Arana v. Henry St. Prop. Holdings, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 05199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Vivar v. 441 Realty, LLC
128 A.D.3d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)