Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Munday v. State

Munday v. State

547 So. 2d 336, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1900, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4567, 1989 WL 90491
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 1989
DocketNo. 88-3000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 547 So. 2d 336 (Munday v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munday v. State, 547 So. 2d 336, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1900, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4567, 1989 WL 90491 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. However, the imposition of costs is REVERSED because appellant was not given adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Williams v. State, 538 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Reese v. State, 521 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The case is REMANDED to the trial court with directions to either strike the imposi[337]*337tion of costs or to rehear this issue in accordance with Jenkins.

BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. State
564 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Langston v. State
551 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 So. 2d 336, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1900, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4567, 1989 WL 90491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munday-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.