Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Munday v. State

Munday v. State

513 So. 2d 764, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2374, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12285
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 1987
DocketNo. BO-253
StatusPublished

This text of 513 So. 2d 764 (Munday v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munday v. State, 513 So. 2d 764, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2374, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals raising several issues, only one of which merits discussion. In sentencing appellant, the trial court departed from the recommended range of the guidelines, giving as one of its reasons appellant’s status as a habitual offender. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court declared this to be an invalid reason for departure in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentenc-ing. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

SMITH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albritton v. State
476 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Whitehead v. State
498 So. 2d 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
513 So. 2d 764, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2374, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munday-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.