Muncey v. Star Brite Distributors, Inc.
This text of 378 So. 2d 1326 (Muncey v. Star Brite Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bill MUNCEY, D/B/a Bill Muncey Industries, Appellant,
v.
STAR BRITE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Garber & Buoniconti, Miami, for appellant.
Rollnick, Squitero & Katz and Marc L. Faust, Miami, for appellee.
Before HAVERFIELD, C.J., and PEARSON and NESBITT, JJ.
*1327 PER CURIAM.
The trial court erred in, sua sponte, entering a summary final judgment against the plaintiff, where there was no motion pending therefor and the plaintiff had no notice or opportunity to present opposing affidavits. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510; Moseley v. Bi-Lo Supermarket, Inc., 341 So.2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and Babb v. Lincoln Auto Finance Co., 133 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). The cases of Roberts v. Braynon, 90 So.2d 623 (Fla. 1956) and Raphael v. Koretzky, 102 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958) relied upon by the defendant are distinguishable because they represent a well defined line of cases which authorize the trial court to initiate and entertain summary judgment at pre-trial conference.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 So. 2d 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muncey-v-star-brite-distributors-inc-fladistctapp-1980.