Mulvane & The Prudential Trust Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

Mulvane & The Prudential Trust Co. v. United States

61 Ct. Cl. 165, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5696, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 346, 1925 WL 2703

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedNovember 9, 1925

DocketNo. D-812

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 Ct. Cl. 165 (Mulvane & The Prudential Trust Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulvane & The Prudential Trust Co. v. United States, 61 Ct. Cl. 165, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5696, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 346, 1925 WL 2703 (cc 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Booth, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is submitted upon stipulated facts. A case substantially similar in all respects was before the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Page v. Skinner, 298 Fed. 731, and decided adversely to plaintiffs’ contention herein. We are in effect asked to sustain a contrary ruling. This we are not disposed to do. All the essential points advanced in behalf of plaintiffs here were vigorously pressed before the Circuit Court of Appeals, and with the opinion of that court we are in accord. We need not repeat the long and involved arguments dismissing plaintiff’s petition. The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Graham, Judge; Hay, Judge; Downey, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booth, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is submitted upon stipulated facts. A case substantially similar in all respects was before the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Page v. Skinner, 298 Fed. 731, and decided adversely to plaintiffs’ contention herein. We are in effect asked to sustain a contrary ruling. This we are not disposed to do. All the essential points advanced in behalf of plaintiffs here were vigorously pressed before the Circuit Court of Appeals, and with the opinion of that court we are in accord. We need not repeat the long and involved arguments dismissing plaintiff’s petition. The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Graham, Judge; Hay, Judge; Downey, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Ct. Cl. 165, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5696, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 346, 1925 WL 2703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulvane-the-prudential-trust-co-v-united-states-cc-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack