Mulloy v. Lawrence

31 Mo. 583
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first instruction given by the land court was right; the plaintiff could have but one lien for the same demand. If he failed to sue in proper time after filing it, he has lost his lien and special remedy thereon; he can not cure his neglect by filing the same lien again.

The second instruction was, however, erroneous. This court has decided in Patrick v. Abeles, 27 Mo. 184, the very point included in that instruction ; that is, that the plaintiff might have a general judgment, though he failed to establish his right to a lien and special judgment thereon.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mulloy v. Lawrence, 31 Mo. 583 (Mo. 1862).

31 Mo. 583 (Mulloy v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullen Lumber Co. v. Lore
537 N.E.2d 123 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1989)
Mullen Lumber Co. v. Lore
527 N.E.2d 243 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1988)
Schwarz & Gottlieb, Inc. v. Marcuse
165 P. 1015 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Bewick v. Price
154 S.W. 876 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Clark Williams Realty Co. v. Briggs
148 S.W. 147 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Barnett's v. Clooney
67 Mo. App. 664 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Hormann v. Wirtel
59 Mo. App. 646 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
South Missouri Lumber Co. v. Wright
21 S.W. 811 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.
20 S.W. 631 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Battle v. McArthur
49 F. 715 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1891)
Wernse v. McPike
86 Mo. 565 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Davis v. Schuler
38 Mo. 24 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1866)