Mulloy v. Lawrence
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first instruction given by the land court was right; the plaintiff could have but one lien for the same demand. If he failed to sue in proper time after filing it, he has lost his lien and special remedy thereon; he can not cure his neglect by filing the same lien again.
The second instruction was, however, erroneous. This court has decided in Patrick v. Abeles, 27 Mo. 184, the very point included in that instruction ; that is, that the plaintiff might have a general judgment, though he failed to establish his right to a lien and special judgment thereon.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
31 Mo. 583 (Mulloy v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.