Mullins v. State
66 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12932, 2011 WL 3586195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mullins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 997 So. 2d 443 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 182 (Fla.1989) (failure to present constitutional argument grounded on due process to trial court procedurally bars appellant from presenting argument on appeal); State v. Fernandez, 546 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (approving a “cash for weight” agreement in which the amount of the confidential informant’s fee was based upon the amount of drugs involved.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mullins v. State, 66 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12932, 2011 WL 3586195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
66 So. 3d 1091 (Mullins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. State
549 So. 2d 179 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
State v. Fernandez
546 So. 2d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)