Mullins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullins v. State

66 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12932, 2011 WL 3586195

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 17, 2011

DocketNo. 3D10-2475

StatusPublished

This text of 66 So. 3d 1091 (Mullins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullins v. State, 66 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12932, 2011 WL 3586195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 182 (Fla.1989) (failure to present constitutional argument grounded on due process to trial court procedurally bars appellant from presenting argument on appeal); State v. Fernandez, 546 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (approving a “cash for weight” agreement in which the amount of the confidential informant’s fee was based upon the amount of drugs involved.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 182 (Fla.1989) (failure to present constitutional argument grounded on due process to trial court procedurally bars appellant from presenting argument on appeal); State v. Fernandez, 546 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (approving a “cash for weight” agreement in which the amount of the confidential informant’s fee was based upon the amount of drugs involved.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12932, 2011 WL 3586195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack