Mullins v. Cook

269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 13, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Dismissing.

The appellant has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment by which W. T. Cook recovered of appellant $164.30, and Leslie Webb recovered of appellant $146.30. These recoveries are separate and distinct, though both were -awarded in the same judgment, and they cannot be added to each other for the purpose of making -an aggregate sum sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. Covington Bros. v. Jordan, 125 Ky. 73, 100 S. W. 326, 30 Ky. L. R. 1135, 15 Anns Cas. 491; Wood v. Moss, et al., 176 Ky. 419, 195 S. W. 1077; Smith v. Berry, 167 Ky. 646, 181 S. W. 379.

Hence, appellant’s motion for an appeal must be overruled for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mullins v. Cook, 269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925).

269 S.W. 338 (Mullins v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. Old Planing Mill Co.
271 S.W.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1954)