Mullins v. Cook

269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 13, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 S.W. 338 (Mullins v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullins v. Cook, 269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Dismissing.

The appellant has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment by which W. T. Cook recovered of appellant $164.30, and Leslie Webb recovered of appellant $146.30. These recoveries are separate and distinct, though both were -awarded in the same judgment, and they cannot be added to each other for the purpose of making -an aggregate sum sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. Covington Bros. v. Jordan, 125 Ky. 73, 100 S. W. 326, 30 Ky. L. R. 1135, 15 Anns Cas. 491; Wood v. Moss, et al., 176 Ky. 419, 195 S. W. 1077; Smith v. Berry, 167 Ky. 646, 181 S. W. 379.

Hence, appellant’s motion for an appeal must be overruled for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. Old Planing Mill Co.
271 S.W.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-cook-kyctapp-1925.