Mullins v. Cook
This text of 269 S.W. 338 (Mullins v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Dismissing.
The appellant has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment by which W. T. Cook recovered of appellant $164.30, and Leslie Webb recovered of appellant $146.30. These recoveries are separate and distinct, though both were -awarded in the same judgment, and they cannot be added to each other for the purpose of making -an aggregate sum sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. Covington Bros. v. Jordan, 125 Ky. 73, 100 S. W. 326, 30 Ky. L. R. 1135, 15 Anns Cas. 491; Wood v. Moss, et al., 176 Ky. 419, 195 S. W. 1077; Smith v. Berry, 167 Ky. 646, 181 S. W. 379.
Hence, appellant’s motion for an appeal must be overruled for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 S.W. 338, 207 Ky. 282, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-cook-kyctapp-1925.