Mullin v. Mullin
201 A.D. 863
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon all the papers the facts presented do not warrant the appointment of a receiver pendente lite. The proof must be clear and convincing before such a drastic íemedy is applied in advance of the trial. Blaekmar, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mullin v. Mullin, 201 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
201 A.D. 863 (Mullin v. Mullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sabella v. Sheepshead Bay U-Drives, Inc.
10 Misc. 2d 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Jamestead Realty Corp. v. Cohen
192 Misc. 557 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Kirsner v. Kirsner
257 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)