Kirsner v. Kirsner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirsner v. Kirsner

257 A.D. 840, 11 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8106

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order appointing receiver pendente lite in an action by a wife to set aside a conveyance by her husband prior to his death, on the ground that it was made to defeat her property rights under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion denied, without costs, and receivership vacated. There is no proof that the real property, Which is the subject of the action, is in danger of being injured or destroyed. (Mullin v. Mullin, 201 App. Div. 863; Rappaport v. Otten, 135 id. 386; Laber v. Laber, 181 id. 733.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order appointing receiver pendente lite in an action by a wife to set aside a conveyance by her husband prior to his death, on the ground that it was made to defeat her property rights under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion denied, without costs, and receivership vacated. There is no proof that the real property, Which is the subject of the action, is in danger of being injured or destroyed. (Mullin v. Mullin, 201 App. Div. 863; Rappaport v. Otten, 135 id. 386; Laber v. Laber, 181 id. 733.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Kirsner v. Kirsner, 257 A.D. 840, 11 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 840 (Kirsner v. Kirsner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related