Muller v. St. Louis Housing Authority

Missouri Court of Appeals

Muller v. St. Louis Housing Authority

234 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2007 WL 1673933

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 2007

DocketED 88781

StatusPublished

This text of 234 S.W.3d 431 (Muller v. St. Louis Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muller v. St. Louis Housing Authority, 234 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2007 WL 1673933 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Housing Authority (SLHA) appeals from the Final Award Alowing Com *432 pensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) modifying an Award and Decision (Decision) of the Administrative Law Judge at the Division of Workers’ Compensation. SLHA argues the Commission erred in concluding that SLHA was the statutory employer of Joseph Muller (Claimant), that an exception to statutory employer liability did not apply, and that Claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence in the record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Housing Authority (SLHA) appeals from the Final Award Alowing Com *432 pensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) modifying an Award and Decision (Decision) of the Administrative Law Judge at the Division of Workers’ Compensation. SLHA argues the Commission erred in concluding that SLHA was the statutory employer of Joseph Muller (Claimant), that an exception to statutory employer liability did not apply, and that Claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence in the record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2007 WL 1673933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-st-louis-housing-authority-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack