Mahan v. Greer

234 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 2007 WL 1599550
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2007·No. ED 88903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment. No error of law appears. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahan v. Greer, 234 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 2007 WL 1599550 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

234 S.W.3d 431 (Mahan v. Greer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muller v. St. Louis Housing Authority
234 S.W.3d 431 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)