Muller v. Raskind

142 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 21

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Muller v. Raskind. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 N.J. Eq. 20 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 1928·Published

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 258. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muller v. Raskind, 142 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 21 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

142 A. 918 (Muller v. Raskind) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Muller v. Raskind

135 A. 682 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)

Opinion

Related