Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Muller v. Raskind

Muller v. Raskind

142 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 21
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 14, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 142 A. 918 (Muller v. Raskind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muller v. Raskind, 142 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 21 (N.J. 1928).

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 258. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muller v. Raskind
135 A. 682 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-raskind-nj-1928.