Mullaney v. Mullaney

54 A. 1086, 65 N.J. Eq. 384, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 4, 1903·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the court below.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VOORHEES, VROOM — 11. For reversal — Dixon—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mullaney v. Mullaney, 54 A. 1086, 65 N.J. Eq. 384, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 280 (N.J. 1903).

54 A. 1086 (Mullaney v. Mullaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allesandra v. Gross
453 A.2d 904 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Gareeb v. Weinstein
390 A.2d 706 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Scott v. BODNAR'S LIQUOR STORE
145 A.2d 643 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Simmons v. Simmons
114 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Heuter v. Coastal Air Lines, Inc.
79 A.2d 880 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
In Re Dunn
68 A.2d 783 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Vaughan v. Vaughan
53 A.2d 625 (Monmouth County Surrogate's Court, 1947)
Equity Corp. v. Groves
53 A.2d 505 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1947)
Middlesex County Welfare Board v. Motolinsky
35 A.2d 463 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Franzen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
51 F. Supp. 578 (D. New Jersey, 1943)
In Re Hazeltine
182 A. 357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1936)
Easton v. Goodwin
181 A. 275 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Cooper v. Cooper
168 A. 153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
Sturm v. Sturm
163 A. 5 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
In re the Estate of Erlanger
145 Misc. 1 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
In Re Fulper
99 N.J. Eq. 293 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)
In Re Love's Estate
1914 OK 332 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
In re Estate of James
3 Coffey 130 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1897)