Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Mulero v. Commissioner of Correction

Mulero v. Commissioner of Correction

33 A.3d 741, 303 Conn. 917
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
DocketNot in source
StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.3d 741 (Mulero v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mulero v. Commissioner of Correction, 33 A.3d 741, 303 Conn. 917 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

33 A.3d 741 (2011)
303 Conn. 917

Felipe MULERO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Not in source.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

December 20, 2011.

David B. Rozwaski, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Felipe Mulero's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 901, 30 A.3d 761, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mulero v. Commissioner of Correction
33 A.3d 741 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.3d 741, 303 Conn. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulero-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-2011.