Muir v. Muir

944 So. 2d 552, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21768, 2006 WL 3813623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Muir v. Muir. Read the opinion of the Court — 925 So. 2d 356
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2006·No. No. 5D05-3675·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Muir v. Muir, 925 So.2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (Muir I), we determined that, based on contract language in the marital settlement agreement, the retroactive reduction in alimony should commence on the date Appellant started making reduced alimony payments. While Muir I was pending, the order being challenged in the instant appeal was entered. It determines alimony arrearages in contravention of the settlement agreement and our mandate in Muir I. On remand, the court shall recalculate arrearages consistent with Muir I.

We have considered and rejected, without discussion, Appellant’s second point on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muir v. Muir, 944 So. 2d 552, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21768, 2006 WL 3813623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

944 So. 2d 552 (Muir v. Muir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muir v. Muir
925 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)