Muir v. Muir

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Muir v. Muir

925 So. 2d 360, 2006 WL 733791

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Muir v. Muir. Read the opinion of the Court — 925 So. 2d 356 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2005·No. No. 5D05-483·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Colin Muir, the former husband, appeals from an order establishing and requiring him to pay alimony arrearages and attorney’s fees to his former wife, Carol Ann Muir. In a related case, Muir v. Muir, No. 5D05-1998, 925 So.2d 356, 2006 WL 435728 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.24, 2006), we reversed the trial court’s methodology employed to calculate the alimony arrearage. For that same reason, the arrearage in this case must be reversed and reconsidered in light of our earlier Muir opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Colin Muir, the former husband, appeals from an order establishing and requiring him to pay alimony arrearages and attorney’s fees to his former wife, Carol Ann Muir. In a related case, Muir v. Muir, No. 5D05-1998, 925 So.2d 356, 2006 WL 435728 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.24, 2006), we reversed the trial court’s methodology employed to calculate the alimony arrearage. For that same reason, the arrearage in this case must be reversed and reconsidered in light of our earlier Muir opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Muir v. Muir, 925 So. 2d 360, 2006 WL 733791 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

925 So. 2d 360 (Muir v. Muir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related