Muir v. Muir

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Muir v. Muir

925 So. 2d 360, 2006 WL 733791

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 2005

DocketNo. 5D05-483

StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 360 (Muir v. Muir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muir v. Muir, 925 So. 2d 360, 2006 WL 733791 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Colin Muir, the former husband, appeals from an order establishing and requiring him to pay alimony arrearages and attorney’s fees to his former wife, Carol Ann Muir. In a related case, Muir v. Muir, No. 5D05-1998, 925 So.2d 356, 2006 WL 435728 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.24, 2006), we reversed the trial court’s methodology employed to calculate the alimony arrearage. For that same reason, the arrearage in this case must be reversed and reconsidered in light of our earlier Muir opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Colin Muir, the former husband, appeals from an order establishing and requiring him to pay alimony arrearages and attorney’s fees to his former wife, Carol Ann Muir. In a related case, Muir v. Muir, No. 5D05-1998, 925 So.2d 356, 2006 WL 435728 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.24, 2006), we reversed the trial court’s methodology employed to calculate the alimony arrearage. For that same reason, the arrearage in this case must be reversed and reconsidered in light of our earlier Muir opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 So. 2d 360, 2006 WL 733791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muir-v-muir-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack