Mtd Products Inc. v. Iancu
This text of Mtd Products Inc. v. Iancu (Mtd Products Inc. v. Iancu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MTD PRODUCTS INC., Appellant
v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2017-2294 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 00219. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN CIPOLLA, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleve- land, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA FRIEDMAN, TRACY SCOTT JOHNSON, MARK MCDOUGALL.
PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, PETER JOHN SAWERT. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mtd Products Inc. v. Iancu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mtd-products-inc-v-iancu-cafc-2019.