Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court

215 Cal. 771

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 31, 1932

DocketS. F. No. 14566

StatusPublished

This text of 215 Cal. 771 (Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court, 215 Cal. 771 (Cal. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Mandate to compel respondent judge to settle a bill of exceptions on appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought in the respondent court [772]*772entitled: Roderick McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp., (No. 6318). The facts presented by the record herein are the same, so far as pertinent, as those involved in the case of Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court, (No. S. F. 14565) ante, p. 559 [12 Pac. (2d) 10], this day decided. On the authority of that case it is ordered that the peremptory writ issue as prayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Mandate to compel respondent judge to settle a bill of exceptions on appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought in the respondent court [772]*772entitled: Roderick McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp., (No. 6318). The facts presented by the record herein are the same, so far as pertinent, as those involved in the case of Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court, (No. S. F. 14565) ante, p. 559 [12 Pac. (2d) 10], this day decided. On the authority of that case it is ordered that the peremptory writ issue as prayed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 Cal. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-shasta-power-corp-v-superior-court-cal-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack