Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors

851 A.2d 832, 578 Pa. 196, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1431

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors. Read the opinion of the Court — 582 Pa. 605 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 11, 2004·No. Petition No. 614 MAL 2003·Published

Opinion

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2004, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly determined that pursuant to the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. §§ 10503 and 10510, legal fees incurred by a municipality reviewing a land development plan cannot be assessed against a developer-applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2004, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly determined that pursuant to the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. §§ 10503 and 10510, legal fees incurred by a municipality reviewing a land development plan cannot be assessed against a developer-applicant.

Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors, 851 A.2d 832, 578 Pa. 196, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1431 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

851 A.2d 832 (Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.