Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors

851 A.2d 832

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors. Read the opinion of the Court — 582 Pa. 605 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 11, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2004, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following issue: [833]*833Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly determined that pursuant to the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. §§ 10503 and 10510, legal fees incurred by a municipality reviewing a land development plan cannot be assessed against a developer-applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2004, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following issue: [833]*833Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly determined that pursuant to the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. §§ 10503 and 10510, legal fees incurred by a municipality reviewing a land development plan cannot be assessed against a developer-applicant.

Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors, 851 A.2d 832 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

851 A.2d 832 (Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.