Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens v. Hertz Corp.

3 A.D.3d 523, 770 N.Y.S.2d 757
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 3 A.D.3d 523 (Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens v. Hertz Corp., 3 A.D.3d 523, 770 N.Y.S.2d 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In an action to recover no-fault benefits under an insurance contract, the defendants appeal from an or[524]*524der of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered May 23, 2003, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court entered January 9, 2003, upon their failure to appear or answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant seeking to vacate a judgment entered upon its failure to appear or answer a complaint must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see Manigat v Louis, 262 AD2d 289 [1999]). Generally, the determination whether to set aside a default is left to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, the exercise of which will not be disturbed if there is support in the record (see Gurreri v Village of Briarcliff Manor, 249 AD2d 508 [1998]; MacMarty, Inc. v Scheller, 201 AD2d 706 [1994]). In the instant case, the defendants failed to present a reasonable excuse for their default and failed to establish a meritorious defense. Thus, their motion to vacate the judgment entered upon their failure to appear or answer the complaint was properly denied. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. Zawada
36 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Dessain v. Franklin
25 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Sik Bun Yuen v. Mindy Huang
18 A.D.3d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bergdoll v. Pentecoste
17 A.D.3d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bitterman v. Hurewitz
15 A.D.3d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Jowers v. People
13 A.D.3d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.3d 523, 770 N.Y.S.2d 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-sinai-hospital-of-queens-v-hertz-corp-nyappdiv-2004.