Gurreri v. Village of Briarcliff Manor

249 A.D.2d 508, 671 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 27, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 508 (Gurreri v. Village of Briarcliff Manor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gurreri v. Village of Briarcliff Manor, 249 A.D.2d 508, 671 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered April 4, 1997, which granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability upon the defendant’s default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the failure to serve an answer, the defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its [509]*509delay and the existence of a meritorious defense (see, Siu Lung Cheng v Leader Jewelry Corp., 246 AD2d 526; Miles v Blue Label Trucking, 232 AD2d 382). “The decision as to the setting aside of a default in answering is generally left to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, the exercise of which will generally not be disturbed if there is support in the record therefor” (MacMarty, Inc. v Scheller, 201 AD2d 706).

Here, the record discloses that the plaintiffs attorney repeatedly notified the defendant’s attorneys that the defendant was in default, but that the defendant did not attempt to serve an answer until the plaintiff moved for leave to enter a default judgment. The defendant failed to offer a reasonable excuse for its lengthy delay in serving an answer, and has not demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense to the plaintiffs cause of action to recover damages for personal injuries. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment (see, Jacobowitz & Gubits v Duffy, 236 AD2d 446; Bray v Luca, 233 AD2d 284; Genen v McElroy, 213 AD2d 511). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

599 Ralph Avenue Development, LLC v. 799 Sterling Inc.
34 A.D.3d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Yonkers Rib House, Inc. v. 1789 Central Park Corp.
19 A.D.3d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Blake v. Ponce-DeLeon
17 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens v. Hertz Corp.
3 A.D.3d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Dinstber v. Fludd
2 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Greenspan & Greenspan v. Wenger
294 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Singh v. Friedson
288 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Anifowose v. Rubiano
288 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Beresford v. Waheed
288 A.D.2d 170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Allstate Insurance
283 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Green Tree Financial Servicing Corp. v. Lewis
280 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Angus v. Stephens
276 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Nikac v. Rukaj
276 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Fanarof v. Rentar Development Corp.
276 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Mamdouh v. Osmun
271 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Feiger v. Milgrom
270 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Elite Limousine Plus, Inc. v. Allcity Insurance
266 A.D.2d 259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Pisacreta v. Minniti
265 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Manigat v. Louis
262 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 508, 671 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurreri-v-village-of-briarcliff-manor-nyappdiv-1998.