Moulton v. Gage

138 Mass. 390, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 205
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 138 Mass. 390 (Moulton v. Gage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moulton v. Gage, 138 Mass. 390, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 205 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The ruling was correct. The plaintiff was employed to work upon the platform as it was constructed. There was no hidden defect in it; it was what it appeared to be. The absence of the railing and the risks consequent thereon were obvious, and as well known to the plaintiff as to the defendants ; and, upon familiar principles, the plaintiff cannot recover for injuries sustained in consequence of it.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C & M Builders, LLC v. Strub
22 A.3d 867 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
Sylvain v. Boston & Maine Railroad
182 N.E. 835 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Woelflen v. Lewiston-Clarkston Co.
95 P. 493 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)
Faber v. C. Reiss Coal Co.
102 N.W. 1049 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)
Meehan v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.
72 N.E. 61 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Decker v. Stimson Mill Co.
72 P. 98 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
50 S.W. 795 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Anderson v. Illinois Central Railroad
80 N.W. 561 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)
Carrigan v. Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co.
48 N.E. 1079 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGinnis
68 N.W. 1057 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Denver Tramway Co. v. Nesbit
22 Colo. 408 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1896)
Dehning v. Detroit Bridge & Iron Works
65 N.W. 186 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Pitrowsky v. J. W. Reedy Elevator Manufacturing Co.
54 Ill. App. 253 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Carey v. Boston & Maine Railroad
33 N.E. 512 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Toomey v. Donovan
33 N.E. 396 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Patnode v. Warren Cotton Mills
32 N.E. 161 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Rood v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co.
30 N.E. 174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Anderson v. Clark
29 N.E. 589 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.
29 N.E. 464 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Alcorn v. Chicago & Alton Railroad
108 Mo. 81 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 Mass. 390, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moulton-v-gage-mass-1885.