Mould v. Mould

28 Pa. Super. 322, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mould v. Mould. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Pa. Super. 318
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 13, 1905·No. No. 2; Appeal, No. 252·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is an appeal by A. M. Murdoch from the decree of the lower court and the questions raised are, in principle, precisely like those in Mould v. Mould, ante, p. 818, in which an opinion has this day been filled. And for the reasons therein stated, the assignments of error are sustained and the decree is reversed, and it is now ordered and decreed that the fund be distributed in accordance with the schedule referred to in said opinion ; and it is further ordered and decreed that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mould v. Mould, 28 Pa. Super. 322, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192 (Pa. Ct. App. 1905).

28 Pa. Super. 322 (Mould v. Mould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.