Mould v. Mould

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Mould v. Mould

28 Pa. Super. 322, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1905

DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 252

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Pa. Super. 322 (Mould v. Mould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mould v. Mould, 28 Pa. Super. 322, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192 (Pa. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is an appeal by A. M. Murdoch from the decree of the lower court and the questions raised are, in principle, precisely like those in Mould v. Mould, ante, p. 818, in which an opinion has this day been filled. And for the reasons therein stated, the assignments of error are sustained and the decree is reversed, and it is now ordered and decreed that the fund be distributed in accordance with the schedule referred to in said opinion ; and it is further ordered and decreed that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is an appeal by A. M. Murdoch from the decree of the lower court and the questions raised are, in principle, precisely like those in Mould v. Mould, ante, p. 818, in which an opinion has this day been filled. And for the reasons therein stated, the assignments of error are sustained and the decree is reversed, and it is now ordered and decreed that the fund be distributed in accordance with the schedule referred to in said opinion ; and it is further ordered and decreed that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Pa. Super. 322, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mould-v-mould-pasuperct-1905.