Mott v. Ramsay
90 N.C. 29
Opinion
The case comes before us on appeal of the defendant'without any statement of the “ease on appeal,” and nothing in the record to point- us to any exception to the judgment of the court below. In all such cases it has been the uniform practice-of this court to affirm the judgment of the superior court. Swepson v. Summey, 74 N. C., 551; Utley v. Fay, 70 N. C., 303; Turner v. Foard, S3 N. C., 683; State v. Orrell, Busb., 217; Fleming v. Halcomb, 4 Ired., 268.
No error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mott v. Ramsay, 90 N.C. 29 (N.C. 1884).
90 N.C. 29 (Mott v. Ramsay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dupree v. . Tuten
1 S.E. 775 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)
Mott v. . Ramsay
91 N.C. 249 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1884)