Motley v. Parks
401 F.3d 1030, 2005 WL 674703
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2005·No. No. 02-56648·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Motley v. Parks, 401 F.3d 1030, 2005 WL 674703 (9th Cir. 2005).
401 F.3d 1030 (Motley v. Parks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. City of Oakland
538 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (N.D. California, 2008)
Motley v. Parks
401 F.3d 1030 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)