Motley v. Parks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Motley v. Parks. Read the opinion of the Court — 432 F.3d 1072
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2005·No. 02-56648·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARLA MOTLEY; JUAN JAMERSON,  Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BERNARD PARKS; DARYL GATES; No. 02-56648 GERALD CHALEFF; HERBERT D.C. No. BOECKMAN; T. WARREN JACKSON;  CV-00-01472- ROBERT M. TALCOTT; RAYMOND C. MMM FISHER; GUADALUPE SANCHEZ; ORDER GREGORY KADING; AL RUEGG; JAMES BLACK; LAWRENCE WEBSTER; DEAN HANSELL, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed March 21, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judge Fisher is recused.

3577 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motley v. Parks, (9th Cir. 2005).

Motley v. Parks (Motley v. Parks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.