Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Independent Moving Pictures Co. of America
200 F. 411, 118 C.C.A. 563, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1857
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 10, 1912·No. No. 228·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinions
The majority of the court are of the opinion that the decree appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Judge Hand; and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Independent Moving Pictures Co. of America, 200 F. 411, 118 C.C.A. 563, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1857 (2d Cir. 1912).
200 F. 411 (Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Independent Moving Pictures Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kammerer Corp. v. McCullough
39 F. Supp. 213 (S.D. California, 1941)
American Tri-Ergon Corp. v. Paramount Publix Corp.
4 F. Supp. 462 (E.D. New York, 1933)
Traitel Marble Co. v. Manhattan Terrazzo Brass Strip Co.
60 F.2d 61 (Second Circuit, 1932)
Deitel v. La Minuette Trading Co.
37 F.2d 41 (Second Circuit, 1930)
Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & Son
36 F.2d 574 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Berry v. Fuel Economy Engineering Co.
248 F. 736 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1918)
Edmands v. Perlman
248 F. 731 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1918)
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Calehuff Supply Co.
248 F. 724 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1918)
Karl Kiefer Mach. Co. v. Unionwerke, A. G.
218 F. 847 (S.D. New York, 1914)