Moten v. Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center

61 F. App'x 97
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2003·No. 03-6085·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Laron A. Moten, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). * An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas *98 corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Miller El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moten has not satisfied this standard. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

Moten does not challenge on appeal the district court’s dismissal of two claims in a prior order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the court’s dismissal of one claim on procedural default grounds. Moten has waived appellate review of these claims by failing to *98 raise them in his informal brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moten v. Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center, 61 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2003).

61 F. App'x 97 (Moten v. Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moten v. Hinkle, Warden
540 U.S. 898 (Supreme Court, 2003)