Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Moss v. Burch

Moss v. Burch

24 S.E. 865, 99 Ga. 94
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 865 (Moss v. Burch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moss v. Burch, 24 S.E. 865, 99 Ga. 94 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Where the only evidence of the service of a bill of exceptions consisted of an acknowledgment thereon in these words: “Due and legal service acknowledged on the within bill of exceptions; copy and all further service is hereby waived,” signed by counsel for the defendant in error after the expiration of more than ten days from the date upon which [95]*95the bill of exceptions was certified, the service was too late, and a motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Phillips v. McNeice, 50 Ga. 358; Marietta Paper Co. v. Faw, 64 Ga. 450. Writ of error dismissed.

May 11, 1896. Argued at the last term. Enoch Faw and H. B. Moss, for plaintiff in error. R. N. Holland, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. State
89 S.E. 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Reynolds Banking Co. v. Beeland
82 S.E. 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Varn v. Chapman
73 S.E. 507 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Bone v. State
67 S.E. 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Dunlap v. Seals
60 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 865, 99 Ga. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-burch-ga-1896.