Dunlap v. Seals

60 S.E. 851, 130 Ga. 350
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 25, 1908·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Where the only evidence of the service of a bill of exceptions consisted of an acknowledgment thereon in these words: “Due and legal service of the within and foregoing bill of exceptions acknowledged, copy and all other and further notice and service waived,” signed by counsel for the defendant in error after the expiration of more than ten days from the date upon which the bill of exceptions was certified, the service was too late, and a motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Moss v. Burch, 99 Ga. 94 (24 S. E. 865).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunlap v. Seals, 60 S.E. 851, 130 Ga. 350 (Ga. 1908).

60 S.E. 851 (Dunlap v. Seals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. State
89 S.E. 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Reynolds Banking Co. v. Beeland
82 S.E. 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Bone v. State
67 S.E. 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Myers v. Hamil
61 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)