Mosley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mosley v. State

543 So. 2d 340, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1989 WL 49628

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1989

DocketNo. 88-850

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 340 (Mosley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosley v. State, 543 So. 2d 340, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1989 WL 49628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant challenges a sentence imposed for the offense of trafficking in cocaine. In imposing this sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, the court assessed points in the guidelines computation for “legal constraint” at the time of the offense. The record establishes that appellant had been released on a cash appearance bond prior to this offense. It was indicated that the bond was subsequently forfeited, but the record does not show when or for what reason it was forfeited. Pretrial bail-bond release does not constitute “legal constraint” under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6. See Jones v. State, 520 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also, Jaggers v. State, 509 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), aff'd, 526 So.2d 682 (Fla.1988).

The points assessed for legal constraint altered appellant’s recommended sentencing range. The sentence is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant challenges a sentence imposed for the offense of trafficking in cocaine. In imposing this sentence pursuant to the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 sentencing guidelines, the court assessed points in the guidelines computation for “legal constraint” at the time of the offense. The record establishes that appellant had been released on a cash appearance bond prior to this offense. It was indicated that the bond was subsequently forfeited, but the record does not show when or for what reason it was forfeited. Pretrial bail-bond release does not constitute “legal constraint” under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.6. See Jones v. State, 520 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also, Jaggers v. State, 509 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), aff'd, 526 So.2d 682 (Fla.1988).

The points assessed for legal constraint altered appellant’s recommended sentencing range. The sentence is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 So. 2d 340, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1160, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1989 WL 49628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack