Mize v. State

495 So. 2d 845, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 1986
Docket85-2476
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 495 So. 2d 845 (Mize v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mize v. State, 495 So. 2d 845, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

495 So.2d 845 (1986)

Jack MIZE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-2476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 7, 1986.

*846 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In computing the defendant's guidelines score, the trial court, over objection, included points under the "legal status" or "legal constraint" category because, at the time Mize committed the instant offense in Monroe County, he had been granted pretrial custody release on a Dade County felony charge. We agree with Mize that this addition was unauthorized.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701d expressly provides:

6. Legal status at time of offense is defined as follows: Offenders on parole, probation, or community control; in custody serving a sentence; escapees; fugitives who have fled to avoid prosecution or who have failed to appear for a criminal judicial proceeding or who have violated conditions of a supersedeas bond; and offenders in pretrial intervention or diversion programs.

The self-evident fact that this does not include a pretrial release status is confirmed by the Guidelines Commission's comment to the rule which states that "[f]orms of pretrial release (bail) were expressly excluded from this definition." Sentencing Guidelines Commission, Guidelines Manual, Rule 3.701(d)6 comment (1983). Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing under the guidelines without including points for the "legal status" factor.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. State
59 So. 3d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Annunziata v. State
697 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Fox v. State
608 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Thompson v. State
585 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Mosley v. State
543 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Jones v. State
520 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Jaggers v. State
509 So. 2d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
495 So. 2d 845, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mize-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.