Mosley v. Fryer & Son

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mosley v. Fryer & Son

27 S.E. 667, 102 Ga. 564, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 581

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 22, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 S.E. 667 (Mosley v. Fryer & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosley v. Fryer & Son, 27 S.E. 667, 102 Ga. 564, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 581 (Ga. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The record in this case discloses with absolute certainty that no-error was committed. Upon the evidence introduced the judge who tried the case without the intervention of a jury rightly dismissed the illegality, the same being without merit; and also properly denied the amendment offered thereto, the defendant in execution not swearing that he did not know of the ground set forth in the proposed amendment when the original affidavit was filed. See Civil Code, § 5120.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

The record in this case discloses with absolute certainty that no-error was committed. Upon the evidence introduced the judge who tried the case without the intervention of a jury rightly dismissed the illegality, the same being without merit; and also properly denied the amendment offered thereto, the defendant in execution not swearing that he did not know of the ground set forth in the proposed amendment when the original affidavit was filed. See Civil Code, § 5120.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 S.E. 667, 102 Ga. 564, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-fryer-son-ga-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack