Kile v. City of Marietta

155 S.E. 498, 42 Ga. App. 169, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 276
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1930
Docket20652
StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 498 (Kile v. City of Marietta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kile v. City of Marietta, 155 S.E. 498, 42 Ga. App. 169, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where a proffered amendment to an affidavit of illegality, contains no averment under oath that the additional grounds set out therein were unknown to the affiant at the time of the filing of the original affidavit, the amendment is properly disallowed.. Civil Code (1910), § 5704; Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Cone, 17 Ga. App. 786 (4) (88 S. E. 701) ; Mosley v. Fryer, 102 Ga. 564 (27 S. E. 667) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (2) (16 S. E. 967).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in disallowing the proffered amendment to the affidavit of illegality, or thereafter in overruling and dismissing the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Smith
16 S.E. 967 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
Binder v. Ragsdale
28 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Mosley v. Fryer & Son
27 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Cone
88 S.E. 701 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.E. 498, 42 Ga. App. 169, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kile-v-city-of-marietta-gactapp-1930.