Kile v. City of Marietta
This text of 155 S.E. 498 (Kile v. City of Marietta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a proffered amendment to an affidavit of illegality, contains no averment under oath that the additional grounds set out therein were unknown to the affiant at the time of the filing of the original affidavit, the amendment is properly disallowed.. Civil Code (1910), § 5704; Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Cone, 17 Ga. App. 786 (4) (88 S. E. 701) ; Mosley v. Fryer, 102 Ga. 564 (27 S. E. 667) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (2) (16 S. E. 967).
2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in disallowing the proffered amendment to the affidavit of illegality, or thereafter in overruling and dismissing the affidavit of illegality.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 S.E. 498, 42 Ga. App. 169, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kile-v-city-of-marietta-gactapp-1930.