Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.
This text of 529 N.E.2d 420 (Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order of the Appellate Division insofar as it granted summary judgment to defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (137 AD2d 170) addressing that portion of the litigation; appeal from so much of the order insofar as it denied plaintiffs’ [948]*948motion for summary judgment against defendants Seiger & Smith, Inc., and Vasaka dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action between the affected parties within the meaning of the Constitution.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 N.E.2d 420, 72 N.Y.2d 945, 533 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moshiko-inc-v-seiger-smith-inc-ny-1988.