Mosher v. Community Bridges Incorporated

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedJuly 24, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01267
StatusUnknown

This text of Mosher v. Community Bridges Incorporated (Mosher v. Community Bridges Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosher v. Community Bridges Incorporated, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Opinion

1 ASH 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Taylor Kristian Mosher, No. CV 23-01267-PHX-JAT (CDB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Community Bridges Incorporated, 13 14 Defendant.

15 16 Plaintiff Taylor Kristian Mosher, who appears to be confined in the Houston County 17 Jail in Dothan, Alabama,1 has filed a pro se handwritten document styled as a “Complaint 18 Civil Action,” which the Court construes as a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983 (Doc. 1) (“the “Complaint”). Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Appointment of 20 Counsel (Doc. 2). Plaintiff has not paid the $350.00 civil action filing fee and $52.00 21 administrative fee or filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will 22 give Plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete 23 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, will deny the Motion for Counsel, and will 24 dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 25 I. Payment of Filing Fee 26 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 27 28 1 Although Plaintiff listed what appears to be a private address in her Complaint, the mailing address indicates that it was sent from the Houston County Jail, and Plaintiff has also provided a booking number. (Doc. 1-1). 1 $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 2 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 3 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 4 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement for the six months preceding the filing 5 of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must submit statements from each 6 institution where he was confined during the six-month period. Id. To assist prisoners in 7 meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a form application. LRCiv 3.4. 8 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 9 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 10 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 11 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 12 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 13 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 14 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 15 Because Plaintiff has not paid the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or filed an 16 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff will be permitted 30 days from the 17 filing date of this Order to submit a properly executed and certified Application to Proceed 18 In Forma Pauperis, using the form included with this Order, or pay the $402.00 filing and 19 administrative fees. 20 II. Complaint Not on Court-Approved Form 21 Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4, Plaintiff is required to use a court- 22 approved form when he files a pro se complaint. Plaintiff’s Complaint is not on the court’s 23 approved form. While the Court may, in its discretion, forgo the requirement that a plaintiff 24 use a court-approved form, see Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4, the Court will require 25 Plaintiff to use the court-approved form here because the Complaint does not substantially 26 comply with the court-approved form. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the Complaint, 27 with leave to amend, for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.4. 28 . . . . 1 III. Leave to Amend 2 Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first amended complaint to cure the 3 deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form 4 to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, 5 the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice 6 to Plaintiff. 7 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 8 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 9 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 10 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 11 A first amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 12 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 13 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint 14 as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the 15 original Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice 16 is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 17 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 18 IV. Motion for Appointment of Counsel 19 There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in a civil case. See 20 Ivey v. Bd. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982). In proceedings in forma pauperis, 21 the court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford one. 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(e)(1). Appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) is required only when 23 “exceptional circumstances” are present. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 24 1991). A determination with respect to exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation 25 of the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of Plaintiff to articulate his 26 claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issue involved. Id. “Neither of these 27 factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision.” Id. 28 (quoting Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)). 1 Having considered both elements, it does not appear at this time that exceptional 2 circumstances are present that would require the appointment of counsel in this case. 3 Plaintiff is in no different position than many pro se prisoner litigants. Thus, the Court will 4 deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. 5 V. Warnings 6 A. Address Changes 7 If Plaintiff’s address changes, Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of 8 address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff 9 must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to 10 comply may result in dismissal of this action. 11 B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mosher v. Community Bridges Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosher-v-community-bridges-incorporated-azd-2023.