Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.
This text of 299 So. 2d 53 (Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of appellant-third party defendant to dismiss on the grounds of improper venue. See, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Company, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 237; United States v. Acord, 10 Cir. 1954, 209 F.2d 709, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 975, 74 S.Ct. 786, 98 L.Ed. 1115; McGrath v. Lund’s Fisheries, D.Del.1959, 170 F. Supp. 173; 6 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 1445 (1971); 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Section 14.28(2), (2nd ed. 1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 So. 2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosby-russell-engineering-associates-inc-v-hudson-co-fladistctapp-1974.